Maine, New Mexico Want Starlink Part of the Mix: Balancing Trade-Offs and Concerns

States wary about the restrictions and delays with looming federal broadband grants are poised to put significant taxpayer resources into Starlink and other low Earth orbit (LEO) satellite constellations. The problem: such services often aren’t affordable, raise environmental questions, and may struggle to keep pace with consumer capacity demand.

Back in March, Maine unveiled a $5.4 million initiative to offer Starlink Low Earth Orbit (LEO) terminals to 9,000 state residents outside the reach of broadband from existing terrestrial providers.

An estimated 9,000 locations in the state (1.5 percent of residents) have no access to broadband, mostly peppered across rural Oxford, Penobscot, and Aroostook counties.

While well intentioned, the state’s initiative immediately sparked a debate about whether Starlink is the best use of taxpayer resources.

Starlink May Be Part of Solution

LEO satellite broadband has understandable allure for state broadband offices tasked with showing the federal government they have a solution for every premise – household and business – in the state. Depending on geography and state, some of these locations may require $100,000 for a terrestrial wireline connection.

Many of these unserved locations may be inhabited for a few weeks a year by the family of billionaires or 52 weeks a year by a family barely able to afford the fuel to live there. Spending $100,000 on that household may mean tens of other households see no improvement or have to settle for worse technology. And depending on who you ask, NTIA either demands that the state actually connect that household or simply have a feasible plan to achieve that connection.

Image

But a key obstacle to broadband adoption is the monthly cost of service. Given the $120 a month subscription cost of Starlink access (plus $350 for hardware, and potential $100 “congestion service charges”), the service doesn’t come cheap for struggling rural Americans.

Maine Connectivity Authority’s Brian Allenby recently stated Maine's 9,000 potential Starlink locations will still be eligible for the $272 million in Broadband Equity Access And Deployment (BEAD) grants Maine is poised to receive in the new year.

But whether LEO satellite access will be declared “good enough” for these areas in order to avoid additional funding remains an open question.

"These 9,000 are a subset of our BEAD locations. We are not taking them off the BEAD map," Allenby told Broadband Breakfast. "We would love to get fiber to as many of those locations as we can, understanding even if they were to receive a fiber award through BEAD, it's going to be a couple years."

Image

New Mexico, similarly waiting for BEAD funding, is also requesting $70 million in state funds to help connect 95,000 locations with satellite broadband in the next two years. Such contracts would primarily benefit Elon Musk and Starlink, but RFPs would also be open to other emerging LEO satellite contractors.

New Mexico has previously estimated that its costs to bring fiber optics to everyone would require between $2.8 and $4 billion dollars. It is receiving $675 million through BEAD.

New Mexico’s proposed program would fund a voucher program for satellite broadband equipment, given the high cost of broadband entry. Unlike Maine, state leaders also hope to include a $30 monthly subsidy for low-income households to lower monthly subscription costs, assuming the proposal is approved by the state legislature.

States handing out terminals and potentially striking contracts to put a floor on delivered speeds and prevent additional charges may blunt some affordability challenges but not all. At the same time, many of these households are likely already paying more than $100 per month for far worse service from geostationary last-generation satellite services like Viasat or HughestNet.

The Problem With LEO Satellite Broadband

Some broadband is better than no broadband, and Starlink is a great option for those out of the reach of traditional options - if they can afford it.

But there’s other factors that raise questions about whether Starlink is the best use of taxpayer resources. Chief among them being the limited satellite capacity that makes the service incapable of scaling to meet the full capacity demands of unserved Americans.

Image

Though Starlink is serving millions of locations across the U.S. and has capacity for more, it is not clear that every location that wants service in Maine and New Mexico could be supported by the current or future constellation.

Starlink has imposed lengthy waiting lists in areas with higher demand, and has told many potential customers service is sold out in their area.

To be clear, while Starlink may be able to serve many millions of people distributed fairly evenly across the United States, it may not be able to simultaneously service thousands of rural homes that are comparatively close to each other in rural Maine; either due to congestion within the visible satellites at any given time, or at the ground stations serving them.

Even with the full planned capacity of 42,000 Starlink satellites, analysts for years have expressed concerns that the service lacks the capacity to scale, strained further by the service’s expansions into arenas like in-flight broadband access partnerships with major airlines. Starlink also faces numerous potential logistical hurdles to a timely expansion of its network.

As Starlink capacity is constrained by demand, slowdowns have increasingly occurred. As the problem gets worse, Starlink will need to resort to greater and greater tricks to manage network load, ranging from extra surcharges for users in congested areas, the throttling of HD and 4K video and big downloads, or more heavy handed network management tricks.

ILSR’s Christopher Mitchell, USI Fiber’s Travis Carter, UTOPIA fiber’s Kim McKinley and CCG Consulting’s Doug Dawson discussed the limitations of Starlink for rural broadband during Episode 102 of the Connect This! Show.

Starlink also poses more than a few environmental concerns not present with traditional fiber or 5G technologies. Most notably the ongoing harm satellite constellations are causing to astronomical research, as well Ozone layer depletion caused by a rotating parade of disposable LEO satellites continually burning up upon orbit re-entry. Some of these issues may be resolvable and some may prove more resistant to fixes.

Then there’s the unreliability of Musk himself, and putting billions of taxpayer dollars into a system run by a man increasingly consumed by conspiracy theories. Federal contractors are also required to maintain a drug free work environment, and Musk’s recreational drug use has worried board members and executives at several of his companies.

If states are interested in ensuring the best possible allocation and outcome from an historic influx of taxpayer broadband subsidies, these are all factors that need consideration.  

A Mad Dash For Billions In Taxpayer Cash

If you recall, Starlink attempted to game the Trump FCC’s Rural Digital Opportunity Fund (RDOF) to glean $886 million dollars in taxpayer subsidies to bring expensive satellite service to a handful of traffic medians and airport parking lots as well as some actual homes.

Image

RDOF has seen no limit of complaints about companies trying to grab subsidies they didn’t deserve for services they couldn’t deliver.

The Biden FCC walked back many of those subsidies, arguing that they were concerned that the increasingly congested service wasn’t capable of reliably delivering 100 megabits per second (Mbps) over the longer haul.

Moreover, the Biden FCC made it clear it would prefer to prioritize the funding of more reliable fiber, 5G, and fixed wireless infrastructure.

The ruling resulted in no limit of complaints by Republicans and Musk, including numerous government inquiries falsely claiming the billionaire was being unfairly targeted by U.S. regulators.

Incoming Trump FCC boss Brendan Carr says it’s likely not possible to reinstate Musk’s lost RDOF subsidies, but Republicans have been making it extremely clear they hope to redirect state BEAD funding toward Starlink wherever possible, showing no consideration of the technology’s capacity, affordability, or environmental constraints.

Whether it is states – who may see no alternative to pushing deeply remote households toward Starlink – or politicians seeking favor from Elon Musk and preferring private solutions to government investment, we expect to see more government entities striking deals with Starlink.

Header time lapse image of Venus and Starlink satellites courtesy of Flickr user Mike Lewinski, Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 Generic

Inline image of Maine Connectivity Authority Communications Director Brian Alleby courtesy of Maine Connectivity Authority website

Inline image of Starlink Generation 2 constellation courtesy of Wikimedia Commons, Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International

Inline image of Elon Musk and Donald Trump at election rally courtesy of FMT, Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 Generic