
Fast, affordable Internet access for all.
On January 30th, the House Energy and Commerce Communications and Technology Subcommittee held a hearing to learn from experts about how to shrink the digital divide and expand Internet access. The committee invited Joanne Hovis, owner of CTC Technology and Energy, to testify.
Make Investment Attractive
Hovis also heads up the Coalition for Local Internet Choice (CLIC) as CEO. She shared a plan that focused on creating an environment that will encourage infrastructure investment by the private and public sectors. The CLIC website shared the six main components of the plan:
Support public-private partnerships that ease the economic challenges of constructing rural and urban infrastructure;
Incent local efforts to build infrastructure — ones that private service providers can use — by making bonding and other financing strategies more feasible;
Target meaningful infrastructure capital support to rural and urban broadband deserts, not only to attract private capital but also to stimulate private efforts to gain or retain competitive advantage;
Empower local governments to pursue broadband solutions of all types, including use of public assets to attract and shape private investment patterns, so as to leverage taxpayer-funded property and create competitive dynamics that attract incumbent investment;
Require all entities that benefit from public subsidy to make enforceable commitments to build in areas that are historically unserved or underserved; and
Maximize the benefits of competition by requiring that all federal subsidy programs are offered on a competitive and neutral basis for bid by any qualified entity.
Hovis began her testimony by assessing our current approaches to shrinking the digital divide. She examined current belief in D.C. that local processes such as permitting and access hold up infrastructure investment and frankly told them that such a belief is incorrect.
From Hovis’s written testimony:
It was just a year ago that we highlighted a nation-leading digital inclusion effort from Wilson's Greenlight municipal fiber network in North Carolina. That was their fourth time on the podcast, owing to the many ways Wilson has developed in ensuring its fiber network investment is benefiting the community. See also podcast episodes 171, 110, and 70.
Will Aycock, General Manager of Greenlight Community Broadband, is back once again to discuss another new program they have developed - a new billing option that unlocks broadband access particularly among low-income households with low credit ratings.
Greenlight has developed a pay-ahead option that allows households to pay ahead of connections so their lack of credit will not deter them from accessing the Internet service they may need for education, work, or other uses. It also allows households to more easily pay down past debts - an important approach in dealing with the financial reality of low-income households. We hope to see more municipal networks developing billing options like this to ensure everyone can have the connections they need.
Though we focus on that billing approach in our interview, don't miss the recent developments in Wilson's ongoing efforts to share the benefits of its network with its neighboring communities, many of whom do not have broadband access.
This show is 15 minutes long and can be played on this page or via Apple Podcasts or the tool of your choice using this feed.
Transcript below.
We want your feedback and suggestions for the show-please e-mail us or leave a comment below.
Listen to other episodes here or view all episodes in our index. See other podcasts from the Institute for Local Self-Reliance here.
Thanks to Arne Huseby for the music. The song is Warm Duck Shuffle and is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (3.0) license.
Early last year, Connect Your Community and the National Digital Inclusion Alliance released a well-researched and compelling case that AT&T had engaged in digital redlining of Cleveland, refusing to upgrade Internet access to neighborhoods with high poverty rates. In episode 290 of the Community Broadband Bits podcast, we check in to learn more and discuss key lessons.
Angela Siefer, executive director of NDIA, and Bill Callahan, President and Director of Connect Your Community in Cleveland, explore what is happening both in Cleveland and other metro centers where low-income residents are often over-paying for services far slower than are available in higher-income neighborhoods.
This discussion covers important ground, not just describing the problem but discussing how the easiest solution (forcing AT&T to upgrade areas it has neglected) is not sufficient. Also, there is sports talk at the beginning but then the host gets himself under control and focuses on what is important in this conversation.
This show is 35 minutes long and can be played on this page or via Apple Podcasts or the tool of your choice using this feed.
Transcript below.
We want your feedback and suggestions for the show-please e-mail us or leave a comment below.
Listen to other episodes here or view all episodes in our index. See other podcasts from the Institute for Local Self-Reliance here.
Thanks to Arne Huseby for the music. The song is Warm Duck Shuffle and is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (3.0) license.
People living at the Arlington Mill Residences in Arlington, Virginia, are on track to obtain no-cost high-quality connectivity this fall, likely through the ConnectArlington network. The initiative is an example of how one local community plans to use its publicly owned Internet infrastructure to reduce the digital divide on its home turf.
The Homework Gap
Within Arlington Mill’s 122 affordable units, live 159 children; approximately half of the residences do not subscribe to an Internet access service. Because homework is increasingly dependent on a child’s ability to work online, kids at Arlington Mills must contend with the problem of finding access to computers and the Internet. For households that do subscribe, no-cost Internet access would free up monthly resources from $50 - $75 per month.
The Department of Technology Services (DTS) and Department of Community Planning, Housing, and Development (CPHD) are collaborating to support the Arlington Digital Inclusion initiative. The initiative will start in Arlington Mills by providing free Wi-Fi to each unit and will eventually move to other properties owned by the Arlington Partnership for Affordable Housing (APAH). As the program moves forward, the city plans to seek out private donations and other grants to reduce the digital divide. The program will also be exploring ways to help residents obtain reduced cost or free devices or computers to take advantage of the high-quality connectivity. APAH has already applied for a 2019 Community Development Fund grant to cover the cost of training and notebook computers for residents.
APAH expects to choose an ISP that will use ConnectArlington, the county's dark fiber network infrastructure.
The network began offering dark fiber services to business customers in 2015, but the infrastructure has been in place since 2012. Arlington took advantage of several infrastructure projects, including traffic control upgrades and other public safety improvements, to expand its fiber footprint. In 2014, Christopher spoke with Jack Belcher, who shared ConnectArlington's backstory, for episode 97 of the Community Broadband Bits podcast.
If everyone subscribed to Internet access, the business models for supplying it would be much easier. But there are strong reasons for why many are locked out of Internet access today, a subject we explore with National Digital Inclusion Alliance Executive Director Angela Siefer in episode 284 of the Community Broadband Bits podcast.
We discussed what digital inclusion is and what prevents people from subscribing to the Internet. There are no solutions to these problems from the federal or state levels - the most promising solutions are bubbling up from communities. Angela tells us how.
We also talk about the problems created by redlining - where ISPs like AT&T systematically refuse to invest in some neighborhoods for a variety of reasons. And toward the end we talk about network neutrality and its impact on the digital divide. If you want more Angela after you finish this interview, listen to her with Veronica Belmont from Mozilla's IRL podcast.
This show is 28 minutes long and can be played on this page or via Apple Podcasts or the tool of your choice using this feed.
Transcript below.
We want your feedback and suggestions for the show-please e-mail us or leave a comment below.
Listen to other episodes here or view all episodes in our index. See other podcasts from the Institute for Local Self-Reliance here.
Thanks to Arne Huseby for the music. The song is Warm Duck Shuffle and is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (3.0) license.
This is the transcript for Episode 280 of the Community Broadband Bits podcast. Christa Wagner Vinson, Deborah Watts, and Alan Fitzpatrick join Christopher Mitchell at the Atlanta airport to discuss the work of NC Hearts Gigabit and how they're organizing for local choice and better connectivity. Listen to this episode here.
Deborah Watts: And you know we need we need to get regulations in legislation that prevents local choice out of the way these people on the tractors the ones in the production rooms the ones in the businesses that can go to their representatives and say You all need to do something about this because I'm having difficulty running my business. I can't be competitive.
Lisa Gonzalez: You're listening to episode 280 of the Community Broadband Bits podcast from the Institute for Local Self-Reliance. I'm Lisa Gonzalez. Christopher recently attended the broadband community's economic development conference where he was able to connect with this week's guests from North Carolina Christa Wagner Vinson, Deborah Watts, and Alan Fitzpatrick from the group and NC Hearts Gigabit joined Chris to talk about local choice and better connectivity in North Carolina and how they're using technology to bring people together. Catharine Rice from the Coalition for Local Internet Choice was also there in this conversation. You'll learn how and see how it's gigabit began. Who's involved. What they've accomplished their goals and you'll also hear some tips on the best way to get the word out and get organized. You can learn more about the group. Check out the collection of resources and even join up at their website and see hearts gigabit dot com. Here's Christopher with Christa Wagner Vinson, Deborah Watts, Alan Fitzpatrick, and Catharine Rice.
Christopher Mitchell: Welcome to another edition of the Community Broadband Bits podcasts. I'm Chris Mitchell with the Institute for Local Self-Reliance in Atlanta sitting on the runway of the Atlanta airport at the Broadband Communities Conference talking to you now with three folks from an organization called NC Hearts Gigabit I'm going to start by introducing Christa Wagner Vinson, the economic development consultant of the group. Welcome to the show.
NC Hearts Gigabit is a grassroots group recently launched in North Carolina that aims to dramatically improve Internet access and utilization across the state. We caught up with Economic Development Consultant Christa Wagner Vinson, CEO of Open Broadband Alan Fitzpatrick, and Partner of Broadband Catalysts Deborah Watts to discuss what they are doing.
We discuss their goals and vision for a more connected North Carolina as well as their organizing methods. Given my experiences dining in that state, I'm not surprised that they have often organized around meals - good stuff!
NC Hearts Gigabit offers an important model for people who feel left out of the modern political system. It is an opportunity to get out from behind the desk, engage others, and build a coalition to seize control of the future for a community or even larger region. And have a tasty lunch.
Learn more on their website or follow them on Twitter.
This show is 27 minutes long and can be played on this page or via Apple Podcasts or the tool of your choice using this feed.
Transcript below.
We want your feedback and suggestions for the show-please e-mail us or leave a comment below.
Listen to other episodes here or view all episodes in our index. See other podcasts from the Institute for Local Self-Reliance here.
Thanks to Arne Huseby for the music. The song is Warm Duck Shuffle and is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (3.0) license.
In Detroit, AT&T is facing a formal FCC complaint accusing the telecom giant of deploying discriminatory “digital redlining” tactics. This is the second such complaint filed against the telecommunications giant since the first of the year.
Demanding Equality in Connectivity
The complaint filed by civil rights attorney Daryl Parks says the FCC violated the Communications Act which forbids unjust and unreasonable discrimination. A month earlier, Parks filed a similar complaint on behalf of three Cleveland residents. In both instances, Parks and community members maintain that AT&T is withholding high-speed Internet from minority neighborhoods that have higher poverty rates.
These complaints fall under Title II of the Communications Act, which contains not only net neutrality rules but important consumer protections regarding discrimination. Title II SEC. 202. [47 U.S.C. 202] (a) clearly specifies:
It shall be unlawful for any common carrier to make any unjust or unreasonable discrimination in charges, practices, classifications, regulations, facilities, or services for or in connection with like communication service, directly or indirectly, by any means or device, or to make or give any undue or unreasonable preference or advantage to any particular person, class of persons, or locality, or to subject any particular person, class of persons, or locality to any undue or unreasonable prejudice or disadvantage.
Large, corporate providers like AT&T have to make shareholders happy, which is why they shy way from investing in regions where they don’t expect much profit. Routinely, those areas include sparsely populated rural communities and urban neighborhoods traditionally considered low-income. Often low-income neighborhoods also include a high percentage of people of color. Attorney Daryl Parks of ParksCrump, LLC, recently filed suit with the FCC on behalf of three residents in Cleveland who are victims of AT&T's "digital redlining."
The Data Tells The Story
In March, the National Digital Inclusion Alliance (NDIA) and Connect Your Community (CYC) released a report on digital redlining in low-income neighborhoods in Cleveland. “Digital redlining” refers to AT&T’s investments in infrastructure, which improve connectivity in areas where they serve, except for neighborhoods with high poverty rates. CYC and NDIA analyzed form 477 data submitted by the telecommunications company and noticed a pattern. The revelations in that report helped the plaintiffs understand their situation and choose to ask the FCC to look deeper into AT&T's questionable business practices.
The event that inspired the analysis was the AT&T DirecTV merger. As part of the merger, AT&T agreed to create a low-cost Internet access program for customers under a certain income level. The speed tier was only 3 Megabits per second (Mbps) download, but AT&T infrastructure investment in Cleveland lower income neighborhoods was so outdated, residents could not obtain those minimal speeds. As a result, they were deemed ineligible for the program.
The Case
The complainants are three African-American residents in Cleveland’s lower income neighborhoods who can’t take advantage of the affordable program mandated by the merger because they can only access speeds of up to 1.5 Mbps download or less. Without the infrastructure to connect at higher capacity, they’ve ended up paying higher rates for slower Internet access.
In a press release on the complaint, Parks stated:
Cooperatives around the country have built on their long legacy of delivering essential infrastructure by starting to deliver next-generation Internet services. Here, we cover the basics of cooperatives in rural areas and then discuss the details of electric and telephone cooperatives that have already branched out into Internet service. Finally, we highlight the first fiber optic cooperative provider, and discuss how other communities have better Internet service through building their own networks.
Read the full policy brief Cooperatives Fiberize Rural America: A Trusted Model for the Internet Era on ILSR.org. View the archive for previous editions of the report.
View a larger version of the cooperative fiber map above, updated May 2020.
Quick Links:
Cooperatives are part of the fabric of rural America. The member owners control the cooperative: each person receiving service is a member of the cooperative and can directly vote in elections for the Board of Directors or even become a member of the Board.
Starting in the 1930s, the U.S. Department of Agriculture supported communities as they created more than 900 electric cooperatives across the country. In the 1950s, the federal government again supported communities building telephone networks, crisscrossing the country with telephone cooperatives to connect rural communities.
Each technology brought new markets, revitalized economies, and revolutionized industries. Cooperatives have a long history of building and maintaining essential infrastructure and providing excellent service in rural communities. Now they have the chance to do that again by building next-generation networks for Internet service.
Rural areas face a number of challenges that urban and suburban communities do not. Low population density coupled with rough terrain can make building infrastructure challenging. Added to these factors, rural communities may not have access to the same financial resources as larger towns and cities do.
Cooperatives, however, have made infrastructure projects work in rural communities for nearly a century. They have access to funding from their membership base, local banks, and often the federal government. Some state governments have expanded their broadband grant and loan programs to include electric cooperatives. Other states have clarified laws and policies to recognize that electric cooperatives can build fiber networks for Internet service using their current infrastructure. A few states have even removed legislative hurdles that stymied investments by electric cooperatives. Technically, the 1996 Telecommunications Act, Section 253, prohibits states from stopping any co-op from offering Internet service, but co-ops in many states are loathe to challenge state law in court.
In 2019, the state removed restrictions that prevented electric cooperatives from using USDA funding for non-electrical purposes, such as broadband networks. Our 2016 report, North Carolina Connectivity: the Good, the Bad, and the Ugly, highlighted how this roadblock kept the state’s electric co-ops from providing service to many rural communities.
During the 2017 legislative session, this state has clarified the language in its laws to allow electric cooperatives to build networks for Internet service.
Cooperatives already have access to utility poles, easements, and Rights-of-Way in the communities that they serve. Indiana, however, needed to clarify that electric co-ops can use this access to provide Internet service, so it passed the FIBRE Act. Other states, including Georgia, Maryland, and Texas, have since followed suit.
Minnesota and Colorado have made funding easier to access for cooperatives interested in providing Internet service. Both states have designed grant programs that promote local solutions to connectivity problems. In Minnesota, cooperatives provide most of the Fiber-to-the-Home Internet service thanks in no small part to that grant program.
Overbuild Or Underbuild?
In Community Broadband Bits Podcast Episode 91, Christopher Mitchell and Lisa Gonzalez discusses strategies for building Internet infrastructure in rural are. What do communities need to thrive?
More than 900 rural electric cooperatives provide electricity to about 12 percent of the U.S. population. Their service area, however, covers more than half of the total land, nearly 2 million square miles. About 90 rural electric co-ops have embarked on fiber optic projects to increase Internet access for their members.
Several of these electric cooperatives started by building fiber optic lines to substations and large demand centers to increase the reliability of the electric system through better monitoring. This could then form the backbone of a network for Internet service to businesses and residents.
We have written many articles and collected several reports detailing how electric cooperatives have tried to increase Internet access in their communities. These stories show the many different ways electric cooperatives have structured partnerships and programs for their members.
Several electric cooperatives provide Internet service themselves. Some started pilot projects, while others built out to their entire service area. The Fiber-to-the-Home project by Valley Electric Association boosted the local economy in Pahrump, Nevada. The co-op has already added 31 new jobs because of the fiber service.
Others partner with an existing telephone cooperative or telephone company. Ouachita Electric in Arkansas is one of the many cooperatives to have done this. By combining their resources and expertise, this partnership is able to extend electric and Internet service throughout much of southern Arkansas.
Many electric cooperatives work together, such as Sho-Me Power in Missouri and LS Networks in Oregon. These cooperatives have provided connectivity for local ISPs and businesses, and now are looking to connect residents.
In episode 229 of the Community Broadband Bits podcast, Jon Chambers, the former head of the FCC Office of Strategic Planning and Policy Analysis, describes how electric cooperatives have the potential to bring Internet access to unserved rural America.
Mel Coleman, president of NRECA and CEO of North Arkansas Electric Cooperative, joined the podcast in episode 243 to discuss how the electric co-op had improved Internet access for its members and what other cooperatives are doing.
This is a list of the rural electric cooperatives that have programs and projects to increase connectivity in their service areas. They do not all provide Fiber-to-the-Home. Some only offer fiber connections to businesses or provide wireless last mile connections while others focus on dark fiber and fiber transport services for other Internet Service Providers. (Total: 109) (Last updated: 12/2019)
Electric Cooperative | State | Project |
---|---|---|
Central Alabama Electric Cooperative | Alabama | FTTH (announced) |
Joe Wheeler Electric Membership Corporation | Alabama | FTTH (announced) |
North Alabama Electric Cooperative | Alabama | FTTH |
Tombigbee Electric Cooperative (freedom FIBER) | Alabama | FTTH |
Wiregrass Electric Cooperative | Alabama | Fiber backbone (under construction) — collaboration with cable company to connect members |
Arkansas Valley Electric Cooperative (WAVE Rural Connect) | Arkansas | FTTH |
Craighead Electric Cooperative Corporation (Empower) | Arkansas | FTTH |
North Arkansas Electric Cooperative (NEXT) | Arkansas | FTTH |
Ouachita Electric Cooperative (ARIS) | Arkansas | FTTH — collaboration with telephone company |
Ozarks Electric Cooperative (OzarksGo) | Arkansas | FTTH |
South Central Arkansas Electric Cooperative (South Central Connect) | Arkansas | FTTH |
Anza Electric Cooperative (ConnectAnza) | California | FTTH |
Plumas-Sierra Rural Electric Cooperative (Plumas-Sierra Telecommunications) | California | FTTH & wireless with fiber backbone |
San Luis Valley Rural Electric Cooperative (Ciello) | Colorado | FTTH |
Delta-Montrose Electric Association (Elevate Fiber) | Colorado | FTTH |
Southeast Colorado Power Association (SECOM) | Colorado | FTTH |
Yampa Valley Electric Association (Luminate Broadband) | Colorado | FTTH |
Blue Ridge Mountain EMC | Georgia & North Carolina | FTTH |
Habersham Electric Membership Corporation (Trailwave; North Georgia Network Cooperative) | Georgia | FTTH; FTTB and Schools |
Jefferson Energy Cooperative | Georgia | FTTB — collaboration with Pineland Telephone Cooperative |
Illinois Electric Cooperative | Illinois | FTTH |
Jo-Carrol Energy (Sand Prairie) | Illinois | FTTH & wireless with fiber backbone |
Jackson County Rural Electric Membership Corporation (Jackson Connect) | Indiana | FTTH |
Johnson County Rural Electric Membership Corporation | Indiana | FTTH — collaboration with NineStar Connect |
NineStar Connect (merger between Central Indiana Power and Hancock Telecom) | Indiana | FTTH |
Orange County Rural Electric Membership Corporation | Indiana | FTTH |
South Central Indiana Rural Electric Membership Corporation | Indiana | FTTH |
Tipmont Rural Electric Membership Corporation (Wintek) | Indiana | FTTH |
Allamakee-Clayton Electric Cooperative (AC Skyways) | Iowa | Wireless with fiber backbone |
Maquoketa Valley Rural Electric Cooperative (MVLink) | Iowa | FTTH |
Bulter Electric Cooperative (Velocity) | Kansas | FTTH |
Warren Rural Electric Cooperative Corporation | Kentucky | FTTH pilot projects (announced) — collaborations with North Central Telephone Company and Franklin Electric Power Board |
Great Lakes Energy (Truestream) | Michigan | FTTH |
Midwest Energy Cooperative (Midwest Energy and Communications) | Michigan | FTTH |
Tri-County Electric Cooperative (HomeWorks Connect) | Michigan | FTTH |
Arrowhead Electric Cooperative (True North Broadband) | Minnesota | FTTH |
Meeker Cooperative Light and Power Association (Vibrant Broadband) | Minnesota | Wireless with fiber backbone — collaboration with Mabel Cooperative Telephone Company and Spring Grove Communications |
MiEnergy Electric Cooperative | Minnesota | FTTH & wireless with fiber backbone |
Mille Lacs Energy Cooperative (XStream Internet) | Minnesota | FTTH — collaboration with telephone cooperative CTC |
Roseau Electric Cooperative | Minnesota | FTTH (announced) — collaboration with local telephone company |
Alcorn County Electric Power Association (ACE Fiber) | Mississippi | FTTH (announced) |
Coast Electric Power Association (CoastConnect) | Mississippi | FTTH (announced) |
Delta Electric Power Association | Mississippi | FTTH |
Monroe County Electric Power Association (M-Pulse Fiber) | Mississippi | FTTH (announced) |
Natchez Trace Electric Power Association (NT Spark) | Mississippi | FTTH |
Northcentral Mississippi Electric Power Association (Northcentral Connect) | Mississippi | FTTH |
Northeast Mississippi Electric Power Association (North East Fiber, LLC/NE SPARC) | Mississippi | FTTH |
Pearl River Valley Electric Power Association (PearlComm Fiber) | Mississippi | FTTH (Announced) |
Prentiss County Electric Power Association | Mississippi | FTTH (announced) |
Singing River Electric Power Association (Singing River Connect) | Mississippi | FTTH (pilot) |
Southern Pine Electric Power Association | Mississippi | FTTH |
Tallahatchie Valley Electric Power Association (TVI-Fiber) | Mississippi | FTTH (announced) |
Tippah Electric Power Association | Mississippi | FTTH (announced) |
Tishomingo County Electric Power Association | Mississippi | FTTH |
Tombigbee Electric Power Association | Mississippi | FTTH (announced) |
Barry Electric Cooperative (goBEC) | Missouri | FTTH |
Callaway Electric (Callabyte Technology) | Missouri | FTTH — collaboration with Kingdom Telephone Cooperative |
Co-Mo Electric Cooperative (Co-Mo Connect) | Missouri | FTTH |
Grundy Electric Cooperative (Mid-States Services) | Missouri | FTTH |
Pemiscot Dunklin Electric Cooperative (Pemiscot Dunklin Fiber) | Missouri | FTTH |
Ralls County Electric Cooperative (Ralls Technologies) | Missouri | FTTH |
SEMO Electric Cooperative (GoSEMO Fiber) | Missouri | FTTH |
United Electric Cooperative (United Fiber) | Missouri | FTTH |
Crawford Electric Cooperative / Sho-Me Power Electric Cooperative (Sho-Me Technologies) | Missouri | FTTB & Transport Services |
Gascoasage Electric Cooperative / Sho-Me Power Electric Cooperative (Sho-Me Technologies) | Missouri | FTTB & Transport Services |
Howell-Oregon Electric Cooperative / Sho-Me Power Electric Cooperative (Sho-Me Technologies) | Missouri | FTTB & Transport Services |
Intercounty Electric Cooperative Association / Sho-Me Power Electric Cooperative (Sho-Me Technologies) | Missouri | FTTB & Transport Services |
Laclede Electric Cooperative / Sho-Me Power Electric Cooperative (Sho-Me Technologies) | Missouri | FTTB & Transport Services |
Se-Ma-No Electric Cooperative / Sho-Me Power Electric Cooperative (Sho-Me Technologies) | Missouri | FTTB & Transport Services |
Southwest Electric Cooperative / Sho-Me Power Electric Cooperative (Sho-Me Technologies) | Missouri | FTTB & Transport Services |
Webster Electric Cooperative / Sho-Me Power Electric Cooperative (Sho-Me Technologies) | Missouri | FTTB & Transport Services |
White River Valley Electric Cooperative / Sho-Me Power Electric Cooperative (Sho-Me Technologies) | Missouri | FTTB & Transport Services |
Valley Electric Association (Valley Communications Association) | Nevada | FTTH |
Continental Divide Electric Cooperative (Red Bolt Broadband) | New Mexico | FTTH |
Kit Carson Electric Cooperative (Kit Carson Internet) | New Mexico | FTTH |
Delaware County Electric Cooperative | New York | FTTH — collaboration with local telephone companies |
Otsego Electric Cooperative (OEConnect) | New York | FTTH |
French Broad Electric Membership Corporation | North Carolina | FTTH |
Lumbee River Electric Membership Corporation (Bluewave Communications NC) | North Carolina | FTTH — collaboration with Horry Telephone Cooperative |
Roanoke Electric Cooperative (Roanoke Connect) | North Carolina | FTTH |
Consolidated Electric Cooperative | Ohio | FTTH |
East Central Oklahoma Cooperative (ecoLINK) | Oklahoma | FTTH (under construction) |
Lake Region Electric Cooperative (Lake Region Technology & Communications) | Oklahoma | FTTH |
Northeast Oklahoma Electric Cooperative (Bolt Fiber Optic Services) | Oklahoma | FTTH |
Oklahoma Electric Cooperative (OEC Fiber) | Oklahoma | FTTH |
Consumers Power (Peak Internet) | Oregon | FTTP (open access network) — collaboration with Pioneer Consolidated and Stayton Cooperative Telephone Company |
Central Electric Cooperative (LS Networks) | Oregon | FTTB, Schools, & Transport Services |
Douglas Electric Cooperative (Douglas Fast Net; LS Networks) | Oregon | FTTH; FTTB, Schools, & Transport Services |
Hood River Electric Cooperative (CACHE Communications; LS Networks) | Oregon | FTTH; FTTB, Schools, & Transport Services |
Umatilla Electric Cooperative (LS Networks) | Oregon | FTTB, Schools, & Transport Services |
West Oregon Electric Cooperative (LS Networks) | Oregon | FTTB, Schools, & Transport Services |
Sullivan County Rural Electric Cooperative | Pennsylvania | FTTH (announced) |
Tri-County Rural Electric Cooperative | Pennsylvania | FTTH (announced) |
Mid-Carolina Electric Cooperative (Carolina Connect) | South Carolina | FTTH |
Newberry Electric Cooperative (Carolina Connect) | South Carolina | FTTH — collaboration with Mid-Carolina Electric Cooperative |
Appalachian Electric Cooperative | Tennessee | FTTH |
Cumberland Electric Membership Cooperative (Cumberland Connect) | Tennessee | FTTH (announced) |
Forked Deer Electric Cooperative (Forked Deer Connect) | Tennessee | FTTH |
Gibson Electric Membership Corporation (Gibson Connect) | Tennessee | FTTH |
Holston Electric Cooperative (Holston Connect) | Tennessee | FTTH |
Meriwether Lewis Electric Cooperative (MLConnect) | Tennessee | FTTH |
Sequachee Valley Electric Cooperative (SVEConnect) | Tennessee | FTTH |
Tri-County Electric Cooperative | Tennessee | FTTH |
Volunteer Electric Cooperative (Twin Lakes, powered by VEC) | Tennessee | FTTH — collaboratin with Twin Lakes Telephone Cooperative |
Bandera Electric Cooperative (BEC Fiber) | Texas | FTTH |
Grayson Collin Electric Cooperative (Grayson Collin Communications) | Texas | FTTH |
Guadalupe Valley Electric Cooperative | Texas | FTTH |
Jackson Electric Cooperative (MyJEC.net) | Texas | FTTH & wireless with fiber backbone |
Taylor Electric Cooperative (Access Fiber) | Texas | FTTH |
Victoria Electric Cooperative (Infinium) | Texas | FTTH & wireless with fiber backbone |
BARC Electric Cooperative (BARC Connects) | Virginia | FTTH |
Central Virginia Electric Cooperative (Firefly Broadband) | Virginia | FTTH |
Craig-Botetourt Electric Cooperative | Virginia | FTTH (announced) |
Mecklenburg Electric Cooperative (EMPOWER Broadband) | Virginia | FTTH |
Prince George Electric Cooperative (Ruralband) | Virginia | FTTH |
Columbia Rural Electric Association (Columbia iConnect) | Washington | FTTH Pilot Project |
Orcas Power & Light Cooperative (Rock Island Communications) | Washington | FTTH |
Chippewa Valley Electric Cooperative (Ntera) | Wisconsin | FTTH — collaboration with telephone cooperative Citizens Connected |
There are about 260 telephone cooperatives in the United States. Many provide Internet service as a natural extension of their existing infrastructure. Many started out by providing dial-up and DSL services, but only recently have begun to transition to Fiber-to-the-Home. Some have already transitioned to an all-fiber network, having upgraded everyone in their territory to fiber.
The Rural Broadband Association (NTCA) has a gigabit certification program in order to draw attention to how many small telephone companies cooperatives have built these next-generation networks.
We have featured a number of these cooperatives on our website. Some cooperatives choose to work with local governments or electric cooperatives while others focus on providing service alone. Below is just a small selection of the many cooperatives that have built Fiber-to-the-Home networks.
In Michigan, a rural telephone cooperative got its start in the early 2000s. The community went from sparse telephone service to state-of-the-art Internet service. Read more about Allband Communications Cooperatives unique story here.
Paul Bunyan Communications Cooperative in Minnesota has expanded their GigaZone throughout the northern half of the state, including Red Lake Nation.
In Missouri, Callaway Electric Cooperative and Kingdom Telephone Company (the local telephone co-op) teamed up to form a new company together called Callabyte Technology to deliver Fiber-to-the-Home service.
Episode 188 of the Community Broadband Bits Podcast features Eric Cramer, the President and CEO of Wilkes Communications/RiverStreet Networks. He explained how the telephone cooperative has built a Fiber-to-the-Home network throughout several counties in northern North Carolina.
Cooperatives are not just telephone and electric. There is now a workable model for Internet cooperatives created from scratch. RS Fiber in Minnesota is the first cooperative formed for the express purpose of providing reliable, high-speed Internet service.
We have extensive coverage of how RS Fiber started and the rural communities they have connected. Read more in our report RS Fiber Fertile Fields: New Rural Internet Cooperative.
These cooperatives offer gigabit speeds to residents and/or businesses within their service areas. (Total: 210) (Last updated: 12/2019)
Gigabit Cooperative | State | Type |
---|---|---|
3 Rivers Communications | Montana | Telephone |
Ace Telephone Association (Ace Communications or AcenTek) | Minnesota, Michigan, Iowa | Telephone |
Adams Telephone Cooperative | Illinois | Telephone |
Albany Mutual Telephone Association | Minnesota | Telephone |
Appalachian Electric Cooperative | Tennessee | Electric |
Arkansas Valley Electric Cooperative (WAVE Rural Connect) | Arkansas | Electric |
Arthur Mutual Telephone Company | Ohio | Telephone |
Atlantic Telephone Membership Corporation | North Carolina | Telephone |
Ballard Rural Telephone Cooperative Corporation (Bringing Technology Closer) | Kentucky | Telephone |
Bandera Electric Cooperative (BEC Fiber) | Texas | Electric |
BARC Electric Cooperative (BARC Connects) | Virginia | Electric |
Barry Electric Cooperative (goBEC) | Missouri | Electric |
Bascom Communications | Ohio | Telephone |
BEK Communications Cooperative (BEK Lightband) | North Dakota | Telephone |
Ben Lomand Rural Telephone Cooperative (Ben Lomand Connect) | Tennesseee | Telephone |
Bledsoe Telephone Cooperative | Tennesseee | Telephone |
Blue Valley Telecommunications | Kansas | Telephone |
Bulloch Telephone Cooperative | Georgia | Telephone |
Callaway Electric Cooperative (Callabyte Technology) — collaboration with Kingdom Telephone Cooperative | Missouri | Electric and telephone |
Canby Telephone Association (DirectLink) | Oregon | Telephone |
Central Electric Cooperative (LS Networks) | Oregon | Electric |
Central Texas Telephone Cooperative | Texas | Telephone |
Central Virginia Electric Cooperative (Firefly Broadband) | Virginia | Electric |
Chariton Valley Telephone Corporation | Missouri | Telephone |
Chequamegon Communications Cooperative (Norvado) | Wisconsin | Telephone |
Chibardun Telephone Cooperative (Mosaic Telecom) | Wisconsin | Telephone |
Chippewa Valley Electric Cooperative (Ntera) — collaboration with telephone cooperative Citizens Connected | Wisconsin | Electric and Telephone |
Citizens Connected | Wisconsin | Telephone |
Citizens Mutual Telephone Cooperative | Iowa | Telephone |
Citizens Telephone Cooperative | Virginia | Telephone |
Citizens Telephone Cooperative | Wisconsin | Telephone |
Clay County Rural Telephone Cooperative (Endeavor Communications) | Indiana | Telephone |
Co-Mo Electric Cooperative (Co-Mo Connect) | Missouri | Electric |
Cochrane Cooperative Telephone Company | Wisconsin | Telephone |
Columbia Rural Electric Association (Columbia iConnect) | Washington | Electric |
Columbus Telephone (Optic Communications) | Kansas | Telephone |
Consolidated Electric Cooperative | Ohio | Electric |
Consolidated Telcom | North Dakota | Telephone |
Consolidated Telephone Company (CTC) | Minnesota | Telephone |
Cooperative Telephone Exchange | Iowa | Telephone |
Copper Valley Telephone Cooperative (Copper Valley Telecom) | Alaska | Telephone |
Craighead Electric Cooperative Corporation (Empower) | Arkansas | Electric |
Craw Kan Telephone Cooperative | Kansas | Telephone |
Crawford Electric Cooperative / Sho-Me Power Electric Cooperative (Sho-Me Technologies) | Missouri | Electric |
Custer Telephone Cooperative, Inc. | Idaho | Telephone |
Dakota Central Telecommunications | North Dakota | Telephone |
Danville Mutual Telephone Company (i-connect you) | Iowa | Telephone |
Daviess-Martin Rural Telephone Corporation (RTC Communications) | Indiana | Telephone |
DeKalb Telephone Cooperative, Inc | Tennessee | Telephone |
Delaware County Electric Cooperative | New York | Electric |
Delta-Montrose Electric Association (Elevate Fiber) | Colorado | Electric |
Dickey Rural Telephone Cooperative | North Dakota | Telephone |
Douglas Electric Cooperative (Douglas Fast Net; LS Networks) | Oregon | Electric |
Eastern New Mexico Rural Telephone Cooperative (Plateau Telecommunications) | New Mexico | Telephone |
Eastern Oregon Telecom | Oregon | Telephone |
Ellsworth Cooperative Telephone Association | Iowa | Telephone |
Emery Telcom | Utah | Telephone |
Emily Cooperative Telephone Company | Minnesota | Telephone |
Farmers Mutual Cooperative Telephone Company | Iowa | Telephone |
Farmers Mutual Telephone Company | Iowa | Telephone |
Farmers Mutual Telephone Company (Acira — partnership with Federated Telephone Cooperative) | Minnesota | Telephone |
Farmers Telecommunications Cooperative | Alabama | Telephone |
Farmers Telephone Cooperative | South Carolina | Telephone |
Federated Telephone Cooperative (Acira — partnership with Farmers Mutual Telephone Company) | Minnesota | Telephone |
Foothills Telephone Cooperative (Foothills Communications) | Kentucky | Telephone |
Forked Deer Electric Cooperative (Forked Deer Connect) | Tennessee | Electric |
French Broad Electric Membership Corporation | North Carolina | Electric |
Garden Valley Telephone Company (Garden Valley Technologies) | Minnesota | Telephone |
Gascoasage Electric Cooperative / Sho-Me Power Electric Cooperative (Sho-Me Technologies) | Missouri | Electric |
Gervais Telephone Company (DataVision Cooperative) | Oregon | Telephone |
Gibson Electric Membership Corporation (Gibson Connect) | Tennessee | Electric |
Golden Belt Telephone Association | Kansas | Telephone |
Grand River Mutual Telephone Corporation (GRM Networks) | Missouri | Telephone |
Grayson Collin Electric Cooperative (Grayson Collin Communications) | Texas | Electric |
Great Lakes Energy (Truestream) | Mississippi | Electric |
Griswold Cooperative Telephone Company (Griswold Communications) | Iowa | Telephone |
Grundy Electric Cooperative (Mid-States Services) | Missouri | Electric |
Guadalupe Valley Electric Cooperative | Texas | Electric |
Guadalupe Valley Telephone Cooperative | Texas | Telephone |
Habersham Electric Membership Corporation (Trailwave; North Georgia Network Cooperative) | Georgia | Electric |
Halstad Telephone Company | Minnesota | Telephone |
Highland Telephone Cooperative | Tennessee | Telephone |
Hill Country Telephone Cooperative | Texas | Telephone |
Holston Electric Cooperative (Holston Connect) | Tennessee | Electric |
Hood River Electric Cooperative (CACHE Communications; LS Networks) | Oregon | Electric |
Horry Telephone Cooperative | South Carolina | Telephone |
Howell-Oregon Electric Cooperative / Sho-Me Power Electric Cooperative (Sho-Me Technologies) | Missouri | Electric |
Huxley Communications Cooperative | Iowa | Telephone |
Intercounty Electric Cooperative Association / Sho-Me Power Electric Cooperative (Sho-Me Technologies) | Missouri | Electric |
Jackson County Rural Elctric Membership Corporation (Jackson Connect) | Indiana | Electric |
Jefferson Energy Cooperative — collaboration with Pineland Telephone Cooperative | Georgia | Electric and Telephone |
Jo-Carrol Energy (Sand Prairie) | Illinois | Electric |
Johnson County Rural Electric Membership Corporation — collaboration with NineStar Connect | Indiana | Electric and telephone |
Kalona Cooperative Technology Company | Iowa | Telephone |
Kingdom Telephone Company | Missouri | Telephone |
Laclede Electric Cooperative / Sho-Me Power Electric Cooperative (Sho-Me Technologies) | Missouri | Electric |
Lake Region Electric Cooperative (Lake Region Technology & Communications) | Oklahoma | Electric |
LaValle Telephone Cooperative | Wisconsin | Telephone |
Leaco Rural Telephone Cooperative | New Mexico | Telephone |
Lehigh Valley Cooperative Telephone Association | Iowa | Telephone |
Logan Telephone Cooperative | Kentucky | Telephone |
Maquoketa Valley Rural Electric Cooperative (MVLink) | Iowa | Electric |
Marquette-Adams Telephone Cooperative | Wisconsin | Telephone |
Matanuska Telephone Association | Alaska | Telephone |
Mecklenburg Electric Cooperative (EMPOWER Broadband) | Virginia | Electric |
Meriweather Lewis Electric Cooperative (MLConnect) | Tennessee | Electric |
Mid Century Telephone Cooperative (Mid Century Communications) | Illinois | Telephone |
Mid-Carolina Electric Cooperative (Carolina Connect) | South Carolina | Electric |
Mid-Rivers Telephone Cooperative (Mid-Rivers Communications) | Montana | Telephone |
Midstate Communications | South Dakota | Telephone |
Midwest Energy Cooperative (Midwest Energy and Communications) | Michigan | Electric |
Mille Lacs Energy Cooperative (XStream Internet) — collaboration with CTC | Minnesota | Electric and telephone |
Molalla Telephone Company (Molalla Communications) | Oregon | Telephone |
Mountain Rural Telephone Cooperative Corporation | Kentucky | Telephone |
Nelson Communications Cooperative (Ntec) | Wisconsin | Telephone |
Nemont Telephone Cooperative | Montana | Telephone |
New Hope Telephone Cooperative | Alabama | Telephone |
New Lisbon Telephone Company | Indiana | Telephone |
Newberry Electric Cooperative (Carolina Connect) | South Carolina | Electric |
NineStar Connect (merger between Central Indiana Power and Hancock Telecom) | Indiana | Electric and telephone |
North Alabama Electric Cooperative | Alabama | Electric |
North Arkansas Electric Cooperative (NEXT) | Arkansas | Electric |
North Central Telephone Cooperative | Tennessee and Kentucky | Telephone |
North Dakota Telephone Company | North Dakota | Telephone |
Northeast Nebraska Telephone Company | Nebraska | Telephone |
Northeast Oklahoma Electric Cooperative (Bolt Fiber Optic Services) | Oklahoma | Electric |
Northwest Communications Cooperative | North Dakota | Telephone |
Oklahoma Electric Cooperative (OEC Fiber) | Oklahoma | Electric |
Orange County Rural Electric Membership Corporation | Indiana | Electric |
Orcas Power & Light Cooperative (Rock Island Communications) | Washington | Electric |
Otsego Electric Cooperative (OEConnect) | New York | Electric |
Ouachita Electric Cooperative (ARIS) | Arkansas | Electric |
Ozarks Electric Cooperative (OzarksGo) | Arkansas | Electric |
Palmetto Rural Telephone Company | South Carolina | Telephone |
Panhandle Telephone Cooperative, Inc. | Oklahoma | Telephone |
Panora Communications Cooperative | Iowa | Telephone |
Paul Bunyan Rural Telephone Cooperative | Minnesota | Telephone |
Peak Internet (partnership between Pioneer Consolidated, Consumers Power, and Stayton Cooperative Telephone Company) | Oregon | Electric and telephone |
Pemiscot Dunklin Electric Cooperative | Missouri | Electric |
Peoples Rural Telephone Cooperative | Kentucky | Telephone |
Peoples Telecommunications | Kansas | Telephone |
Perry-Spencer Rural Telephone Cooperative (Perry-Spencer Communications) | Indiana | Telephone |
Phillips County Telephone Company (PC Telcom) | Colorado | Telephone |
Pineland Telephone Cooperative | Georgia | Telephone |
Pioneer Telephone Cooperative | Oklahoma | Telephone |
Plains Cooperative Telephone Association | Colorado | Telephone |
Plumas-Sierra Rural Electric Cooperative (Plumas-Sierra Telecommunications) | California | Electric |
Polar Communications Mutual Aid Corporation | North Dakota | Telephone |
Prince George Electric Cooperative (Ruralband) | Virginia | Electric |
Rainbow Telecommunications Association (Rainbow Communications) | Kansas | Telephone |
Ralls County Electric Cooperative (Ralls Technologies) | Missouri | Electric |
Randolph Telephone Membership Corporation (Randoph Communications) | North Carolina | Telephone |
Range Telephone Cooperative (RT Communications) | Montana, Wyoming | Telephone |
Red River Rural Telephone Association | North Dakota | Telephone |
Reservation Telephone Cooperative | North Dakota | Telephone |
Richland-Grant Telephone Cooperative | Wisconsin | Telephone |
Runestone Telecom Association | Minnesota | Telephone |
Rural Telephone Service Cooperative (Nex-Tech) | Kansas | Telephone |
San Luis Valley Rural Electric Cooperative (Ciello) | Colorado | Electric |
Scio Mutual Telephone Association | Oregon | Telephone |
Se-Ma-No Electric Cooperative / Sho-Me Power Electric Cooperative (Sho-Me Technologies) | Missouri | Electric |
SEMO Electric Cooperative (GoSEMO Fiber) | Missouri | Electric |
Sequatchee Valley Electric Cooperative (SVEConnect) | Tennessee | Electric |
Sherwood Mutual Telephone Association | Ohio | Telephone |
Skyline Telephone Membership Corporation (SkyBest Communications) | North Carolina | Telephone |
South Central Arkansas Electric Cooperative (South Central Connect) | Arkansas | Electric |
South Central Indiana Rural Electric Membership Corporation | Indiana | Electric |
South Central Rural Telephone Cooperative | Kentucky | Telephone |
South Central Utah Telephone Association (South Central Communications) | Utah | Telephone |
South Slope Cooperative Communications | Iowa | Telephone |
Southeast Colorado Power Association (SECOM) | Colorado | Electric |
Southwest Arkansas Telephone Cooperative | Arkansas | Telephone |
Southwest Electric Cooperative / Sho-Me Power Electric Cooperative (Sho-Me Technologies) | Missouri | Electric |
SRT Communications | North Dakota | Telephone |
Star Telephone Membership Corporation (Star Communications) | North Carolina | Telephone |
Surry Communications Membership Cooperation | North Carolina | Telephone |
Taylor Electric Cooperative (Access Fiber) | Texas | Electric |
The Ottoville Mutual Telephone Company | Ohio | Telephone |
Tipmont Rural Electric Membership Corporation (Wintek) | Indiana | Electric |
Tombigbee Electric Cooperative (freedom FIBER) | Alabama | Electric |
Tri-County Communications Cooperative | Wisconsin | Electric |
Tri-County Electric Cooperative | Tennessee | Electric |
Tri-County Electric Cooperative (HomeWorks Connect) | Michigan | Electric |
Tri-County Telephone Association | Kansas | Electric |
Tri-County Telephone Membership Corporation (RiverStreet Networks) | North Carolina | Telephone |
Twin Lakes Telephone Cooperative Corporation | Tennessee | Telephone |
UBTA-UBET Communications, also known as Strata Networks | Colorado, Utah, and Wyoming | Telephone |
Umatilla Electric Cooperative (LS Networks) | Oregon | Electric |
United Electric Cooperative (United Fiber) | Missouri | Electric |
United Telephone Mutual Aid Corporation (Turtle Mountain Communications) | North Dakota | Telephone |
Valley Electric Association (Valley Communications Association) | Nevada | Electric |
Valley Telecommunications | South Dakota | Telephone |
Venture Communications Cooperative | South Dakota | Telephone |
Vernon Communications Cooperative | Wisconsin | Telephone |
Victoria Electric Cooperative (Infinium) | Texas | Electric |
Volunteer Electric Cooperative (Twin Lakes, powered by VEC) | Tennessee | Electric and telephone |
Wabash Communications Cooperative | Illinois | Telephone |
Wabash Mutual Telephone Company | Ohio | Telephone |
Washington County Rural Telephone Cooperative (Tele-media Solutions) | Indiana | Telephone |
Webster Electric Cooperative / Sho-Me Power Electric Cooperative (Sho-Me Technologies) | Missouri | Electric |
Webster-Calhoun Cooperative Telephone Association | Iowa | Telephone |
West Carolina Rural Telephone Cooperative (West Carolina Tel) | South Carolina | Telephone |
West Central Telephone Association | Minnesota | Telephone |
West Kentucky and Tennessee Communications Cooperative | Kentucky, Tennessee | Telephone |
West Oregon Electric Cooperative (LS Networks) | Oregon | Electric |
West River Telecommunications Cooperative | North Dakota and South Dakota | Telephone |
West Wisconsin Telcom Cooperative (24-7 Telcom) | Wisconsin | Telephone |
White River Valley Electric Cooperative / Sho-Me Power Electric Cooperative (Sho-Me Technologies) | Missouri | Electric |
Wiggins Telephone Association (Blue Lightning) | Colorado | Telephone |
Wilkes Telephone Membership Corporation (RiverStreet Networks) | North Carolina | Telephone |
Yampa Valley Electric Association (Luminate Broadband) | Colorado | Electric |
Yucca Telecommunications Systems | New Mexico | Telephone |
Listen to our collection of Community Broadband Bits Podcasts to learn firsthand about how electric cooperatives have made the decision to provide Internet service.
# | Title | Summary | Guest | Transcript |
---|---|---|---|---|
383 11/19/2019 | Tri-County Rural Electric Delivering Connectivity, Expanding Partnerships, in Appalachians | Co-op finds funding, partners to build broadband network demanded by members | Craig Eccher | Transcript 383 |
369 8/13/2019 | South Dakota Fiber All About the Local | Co-ops, cities, locally-owned companies, and tribal ISPs invest in rural South Dakota | Greg Dean | Transcript 369 |
358 5/28/2019 | Firefly Fiber All the Buzz in Central Virginia | Central Virginia Electric Co-op's new fiber project and how members are embracing better connectivity | Melissa Gay and Gary Wood | Transcript 358 |
344 2/19/2019 | Pemiscot-Dunklin Electric Cooperative Steps Up, Offers FTTH in Missouri's Bootheel | Pemiscot-Dunklin Electric Cooperative's FTTH project in rural Missouri and how the environment impacted network design | Jack Davis | Transcript 344 |
342 2/5/2019 | RiverStreet Networks Reaching Across Rural North Carolina | Co-op partners with other co-ops and communities to connect rural N.C. | Greg Coltrain | Transcript 342 |
324 9/25/2018 | Great Lakes Energy's Big Plan for Big Fiber | Largest electric co-op in Michigan is deploying a FTTH network | Shari Culver | Transcript 324 |
321 9/4/2018 | Analyzing the Auction With Jonathan Chambers | Results of the Connect America Fund Phase II auction, including a strong showing by electric co-ops | Jonathan Chambers | Transcript 321 |
314 7/17/2018 | DMEA Co-op Serving Up Broadband and Innovation in Colorado | The Delta Montrose Electric Association fiber deployment in Colorado | John Gavan and Brad Harding | Transcript 314 |
288 1/9/2018 | North Dakota's Exceptional Fiber Networks | North Dakota has low population density, but many fiber cooperatives | Robin Anderson | Transcript 288 |
277 11/1/2017 | Kit Carson Fibers up New Mexico | Electric Cooperative builds fiber network in rural New Mexico | Luis Reyes | Transcript 277 |
276 10/24/2017 | Allband All-in For Rural Michigan Internet Access | Folks build a cooperative from scratch in rural Michigan | Ron Siegel | Transcript 276 |
249 4/19/2017 | Rural Electric Co-ops as Reluctant Warriors for Broadband | The challenges and decisions that rural electric cooperatives face | Alyssa Clemsen-Roberts | Transcript 249 |
243 3/7/2017 | What's NEXT in North Arkansas? | North Arkansas Electric Cooperative's pilot project for high-speed Internet service | Mel Coleman | Transcript 243 |
240 2/14/2017 | United Fiber Tackles Missouri's Most Rural | The demand for better, faster connections and the role of rural electric cooperatives | Darren Farnan | Transcript 240 |
229 11/22/2016 | Rural Electrics Solve Rural Internet Access Problems | Former head of FCC's Office of Strategic Planning and Policy Analysis on politics and rural connectivity | Jon Chambers | Transcript 229 |
225 10/25/2016 | Midwest Energy Cooperative Connects Rural Michigan | A rural electric cooperative provides fiber connectivity | Bob Hance and Dave Allen | Transcript 225 |
224 10/18/2016 | H.R. Trostle on Co-Ops, Munis, Connectivity in North Carolina | ILSR Research Associate discusses North Carolina and Internet access | H.R. Trostle | Transcript 224 |
203 5/25/2016 | Tennessee Potential Partnership Between Morristown Muni and AEC Co-op | Morristown Tennessee, and the local electric co-op are teaming up to deliver needed services | Jody Wigington and Greg Williams | Transcript 203 |
198 4/19/2016 | A New Cooperative Model for Fiber to the Farm | The RS Fiber Cooperative steals the spotlight with its new cooperative model | Mark Erickson and Jake Rieke | Transcript 198 |
188 2/9/2016 | North Carolina Co-op Fibers Up Rural Counties and More | What does it take for a telephone co-op in North Carolina to provide FTTH? President and CEO of Wilkes Communications and RiverStreet Networks explains | Eric Cramer | Transcript 188 |
140 3/3/2015 | Rural Electric Co-Mo Co-op Goes Gig | Discussion on how Co-Mo electric co-op in rural Missouri structured broadband network and its objective to enter the business and results | Randy Klindt | Transcript 140 |
99 5/20/2014 | Catching Up with the RS Fiber Co-op in Minnesota | Update on the RS Fiber Co-op project in Minnesota | Mark Erickson and Cindy Gerholz | Transcript 99 |
92 4/1/2014 | Understanding the Georgia Communications Cooperative | Discussion on how cooperatives work together and expand the regional network in Georgia and challenges to connect rural premises with fiber optics | Mike Foor | Transcript 92 |
46 5/14/2013 | North Georgia Network Brings Gig to Schools, Jobs to Region | The origin of the North Georgia Network and its economic and social impact on the region | Paul Belk | Transcript 46 |
Image Credits:
Rural Barn Flag, woodleywonderworks, Creative Commons license
Minnesota House Chamber, Chris Gaukel, Creative Commons license