Fast, affordable Internet access for all.
Open Technology Institute Report Details the Cost of Connectivity in the Navajo Nation
This past August, the Open Technology Institute (OTI) (a program of New America) released its 2020 Cost of Connectivity Report, which showed that a combination of regulatory and oversight choices combined with market forces results in Internet access that for most Americans is slower, less reliable, and more expensive than elsewhere in the world.
In October, the OTI followed up that report with one focused on the Navajo Nation. It argues that “altogether, the federal government’s failure to connect people on tribal lands deprives entire tribes of opportunities for employment, healthcare, education, and economic growth in both the short and long-term.”
The Navajo Nation is divided into 109 political subdivisions (called chapters) by geography across Arizona, New Mexico, and Utah. The OTI report finds that just four of those chapters have access speeds which meet the FCC’s standard for basic broadband (25/3Mbps (Megabits per second)), and that many in the community remain stuck on the wrong side of the digital divide.
Claire Park, author of the study, pulled data from the Navajo Nation Woven Integrated Data Project and combined it with FCC data and state broadband maps from March to July 2020, cross checking a sample of addresses with existing residential Internet Service Providers (ISPs) in those areas. It uses a total of 450 offered plans in its data set.
The report succinctly argues that broadband remains just one among the litany of struggles that those living on tribal lands face:
The ongoing COVID-19 pandemic exposes the deeply unjust policies behind stark inequities in certain communities. In the case of tribal nations, the federal government’s lack of support during the pandemic is another chapter in a brutal history of injustice that leaves tribes particularly vulnerable to this disease. Generations of federal policies undermining Indigenous wealth, power, and sovereignty have left many Native people without access to basic infrastructure, including food, running water, safe and adequate housing, telecommunications service, and healthcare.
In this context it offers some startling conclusions about the quality and cost of Internet access available to most living on tribal lands:
- Internet service in the Navajo Nation is significantly more expensive than service advertised in other areas of the United States, burdening many on tribal lands living at or below the poverty level . . . on average $21.70 to $44.01 more expensive than elsewhere in the country.
- The median download speed of our larger U.S. dataset is 150 Mbps, more than 10 times faster than that in the Navajo Nation.
- In 65 chapters, satellite is the only option available.
- Disparities in Internet access on tribal lands are unique, and differ from hardships experienced in other rural areas. While the tribal digital divide is partly a product of many tribes’ rural settings, tribal rural areas lack access to high-speed broadband at higher rates than non-tribal rural areas.
OTI ends with a handful of policy recommendations to begin addressing the connectivity and cost gaps:
- The FCC needs to consistently collect accurate data on the state of internet service in tribal lands.
- Federal subsidies should incentivize adoption of newer, faster technologies and tribal solutions.
- The FCC should better prioritize tribal access to dormant spectrum.
Exploring the economic, educational, and wellness costs of this lack of affordable, fast Internet access to the Navajo Nation are beyond the scope of the report, but they are no doubt more strongly manifested examples of familiar trends: fewer economic opportunities, students who will continue to fall further behind, a continued absence of crucial social connections, poorer health and mental health outcomes, and in general host of other struggles which will persist for a long time..
Read the full report below, or download it here [pdf]. Listen to Episode 435 of the Community Broadband Bits podcast below, where Christopher talks with Catherine Nicolaou from Sacred Wind Communications about their efforts to expand service to Navajo Nation residents in Northwest New Mexico and bring high-speed reliable service to those living there.
Tribal Broadband Bootcamps Announced for 2023
Following Through on Transparency: A Broadband Nutrition Label Status Report
The FCC is under deadline to release an order to “promulgate regulations to require the display of” the broadband nutrition label by November 15 of this year. We’ve taken a moment here to re-access the issue, offer a few updates, and highlight the ingredients of a label that will keep providers accountable and foster transparency within the broadband market.
Indigenous Connectivity Summit 2022 Begins
The sixth annual Indigenous Connectivity Summit kicked off today in Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada, bringing together Indigenous community members and leaders; network operators; researchers; and policymakers to focus on how Indigenous communities in the United States and Canada can expand access to fast, affo
Study: Low Income LA County Neighborhoods Pay More for Internet Service Than Wealthier Neighborhoods
A new study from the Digital Equity LA initiative lays bare how low-income communities of color are impacted by the quiet business decisions of the county’s monopoly Internet service provider. Slower and More Expensive/Sounding the Alarm: Disparities in Advertised Pricing for Fast, Reliable Broadband details how Charter Spectrum “shows a clear and consistent pattern of the provider reserving its best offers - high speed at low cost - for the wealthiest neighborhoods in LA County.” Not only does it highlight how economically vulnerable households in LA County pay more for slower service than those in wealthy neighborhoods, it also provides evidence for how financially-strapped households are also saddled with onerous contracts and are rarely targeted by advertisements for Charter Spectrum’s low cost plans.
In Our View: Slightly Better FCC Maps on Horizon, Maybe
Now that Internet Service Providers have submitted (or were supposed to submit) their most recent data on exactly where they claim to offer broadband service, the FCC announced last week, starting on September 12, states, local and Tribal governments, service providers, and other entities can submit bulk challenges to the data currently in the Broadband Data Collection (BDC) system. While the agency is making a gallant effort to fix its notoriously inaccurate maps, we still see a few potential holes in the fabric.
RDOF, Universal Service Fund, and the Future of Video | Episode 50 of the Connect This! Show
Join us live on Thursday, August 18th, at 3:30pm ET for the latest episode of the Connect This! Show. Co-hosts Christopher Mitchell (ILSR) and Travis Carter (USI Fiber) will be joined by regular guest Kim McKinley (UTOPIA Fiber) and Casey Lide, Partner at Keller and Heckman.